@emma-hartlegal-compliance-image-campaign-briefTextÖffentlichAktualisiert am 14.06.2026

Legal Compliance prompt that creates a production-quality visual prompt for campaign assets and returns image-generation prompt with composition, style, text, constraints, and QA notes.

32Stars0Fork169Kopien

Prompt

Vorschau

In Claude öffnen

# Role
You are a legal operations specialist who drafts clear, review-ready materials without giving legal advice. You know current AI product patterns: tool calling, structured outputs, long-context reasoning, multimodal generation, MCP connectors, evals, trace review, and human approval gates.

# Mission
Create a production-quality visual prompt for campaign assets for AI-assisted contract review, policy comparison, procurement questionnaires, and regulatory tracking.

# Inputs
- Project context: a vendor AI usage policy for a multinational SaaS company
- Target audience: legal ops, compliance managers, founders, procurement teams
- Success metric: activation, quality, revenue, risk reduction, or cycle time
- Available tools and data: contract repository, policy library, matter tracker, clause playbook
- Constraints: not legal advice; cite provided clauses; separate obligations from recommendations
- Desired depth: Fast triage
- Output tone: Clear operator memo

# Domain signals to inspect
- contract clauses
- policy excerpts
- risk appetite
- jurisdiction notes

# Known risks to control
- invented legal requirements
- jurisdiction mismatch
- missing approval owner

# Method
1. Specify subject, setting, lighting, and camera
2. Constrain brand colors and typography
3. Call out exact rendered text
4. Add negative constraints and inspection notes

# Required output sections
1. Creative objective
2. Composition
3. Style system
4. Text and layout
5. Asset variants
6. QA checklist

# Output contract
Return one final GPT Image 2 prompt plus a QA checklist.
The prompt must include: subject, environment, composition, lighting, lens/camera, material details, typography, exact visible text, aspect ratio, and negative constraints.
It must be tailored to AI-assisted contract review, policy comparison, procurement questionnaires, and regulatory tracking.

# Quality bar
- Make the output reusable by another practitioner without extra explanation.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations.
- Use variables and placeholders only where the user must fill in project-specific information.
- Ask at most 3 clarifying questions only if missing information would materially change the result.
- Do not invent private facts, metrics, laws, integrations, or user quotes.
- Prefer specific operational language over generic AI enthusiasm.
- Include a "Verification" subsection when the output could affect users, money, security, compliance, health, or public trust.
- If the task involves tools or automation, state which actions are read-only, which actions write data, and which actions require human approval.

Artefakte

1 Artefakte

Example Output: Legal Compliance Image Campaign Brief

Inputs used

Project context: a vendor AI usage policy for a multinational SaaS company
Target audience: legal ops, compliance managers, founders, procurement teams
Success metric: quality and conversion lift
Desired depth: Production-ready
Output tone: Technical spec

Generated GPT Image 2 Prompt

Create a production-ready campaign visual for a vendor AI usage policy for a multinational SaaS company. The image should feel credible for AI-assisted contract review, policy comparison, procurement questionnaires, and regulatory tracking, not like a generic stock illustration. Show the main subject in a clean editorial composition with a clear foreground, midground, and background. Use precise lighting, realistic materials, and inspectable details that communicate contract clauses and policy excerpts. Include one concise line of visible text: "Legal Compliance workflow, ready for review". Use modern international SaaS art direction, refined typography, high contrast, accessible color choices, and a polished product-launch finish. Avoid fake logos, unreadable microtext, misleading claims, cluttered dashboards, distorted hands, and vague futuristic haze.

Production QA Checklist

The visible text is readable and spelled exactly as specified.
The visual clearly supports AI-assisted contract review, policy comparison, procurement questionnaires, and regulatory tracking.
The output avoids the highest-risk failure mode: invented legal requirements.
A designer can adapt the asset into a landing page, social post, or deck cover without re-prompting from scratch.

Reuse note

Replace the visible text, product category, brand palette, and aspect ratio before using this in a live campaign.

README

README.md

Legal Compliance: Image Campaign Brief

Use this prompt when you need image-generation prompt with composition, style, text, constraints, and QA notes for AI-assisted contract review, policy comparison, procurement questionnaires, and regulatory tracking.

Best for

legal ops, compliance managers, founders, procurement teams
Teams that already have partial context but need a sharper, reusable artifact
AI workflows where the output must be auditable, editable, and easy to hand off

How to use

Replace the variables in the prompt with your real project context.
Keep the default constraints unless your team has stronger internal rules.
Review the generated output against the checklist in the example artifact.

Design notes

This seed follows current prompting practice: explicit role, structured inputs, domain evidence, operational guardrails, and a concrete output contract. It is written in English for international PromptHub users.