@eva-stoneclimate-energy-data-product-brief텍스트공개2026. 6. 14. 업데이트

Climate Energy prompt that turns analytics questions into a decision-grade data product and returns metric contract, analysis plan, dashboard outline, and decision narrative.

40스타0Fork164복사

Prompt

미리보기

생성물

생성물 1개

Example Output: Climate Energy Data Product Brief

Inputs used

  • Project context: a Scope 3 supplier engagement plan for a hardware company
  • Target audience: energy teams, sustainability leaders, public-private operators
  • Success metric: activation, quality, and risk reduction
  • Available tools and data: emissions spreadsheet, supplier portal, GIS layers, policy tracker
  • Desired depth: Production-ready
  • Output tone: Clear operator memo

Generated Result

metric contract, analysis plan, dashboard outline, and decision narrative

Decision to support

Use emissions inventory as evidence, apply the constraint "state methodology", and explicitly note how the plan reduces unclear baselines. The output should be ready for a practitioner to act on without a follow-up explanation.

Metric contract

Define the metric grain before analysis. For a Scope 3 supplier engagement plan for a hardware company, the first dashboard view should show cohort, denominator, time window, and confidence note, not just top-line movement.

Data sources

Rank sources by authority before retrieval. Chunk around task intent rather than page boundaries, and require every answer to cite the exact source segment used for energy usage.

Analysis method

Define the metric grain before analysis. For a Scope 3 supplier engagement plan for a hardware company, the first dashboard view should show cohort, denominator, time window, and confidence note, not just top-line movement.

Dashboard layout

Define the metric grain before analysis. For a Scope 3 supplier engagement plan for a hardware company, the first dashboard view should show cohort, denominator, time window, and confidence note, not just top-line movement.

Decision memo

Use supplier data as evidence, apply the constraint "avoid greenwashing", and explicitly note how the plan reduces double counting. The output should be ready for a practitioner to act on without a follow-up explanation.

Recommended Decision

Proceed with a narrow pilot focused on emissions inventory and supplier data. Treat unclear baselines as the primary launch blocker. The first milestone should prove that the workflow produces a usable climate action brief, data gap list, and stakeholder plan with clear evidence, named owners, and a review path for ambiguous cases.

Expected quality checks

  • The result is specific to AI-assisted emissions reporting, grid planning, climate risk, and energy program design.
  • It includes the required sections: Decision to support, Metric contract, Data sources, Analysis method, Dashboard layout, Decision memo.
  • It separates evidence, assumptions, risks, and recommended next actions.
  • It includes practical verification steps, not only generic advice.
  • It names the most important failure mode for this domain: unclear baselines.

Reuse note

Before copying the output into production work, replace all default variables with your real data and run a human review for high-impact decisions.

README

README.md

Climate Energy: Data Product Brief

Use this prompt when you need metric contract, analysis plan, dashboard outline, and decision narrative for AI-assisted emissions reporting, grid planning, climate risk, and energy program design.

Best for

  • energy teams, sustainability leaders, public-private operators
  • Teams that already have partial context but need a sharper, reusable artifact
  • AI workflows where the output must be auditable, editable, and easy to hand off

How to use

  1. Replace the variables in the prompt with your real project context.
  2. Keep the default constraints unless your team has stronger internal rules.
  3. Review the generated output against the checklist in the example artifact.

Design notes

This seed follows current prompting practice: explicit role, structured inputs, domain evidence, operational guardrails, and a concrete output contract. It is written in English for international PromptHub users.